Mark Sennett
Managing Editor |
Kelly Rose
Editor |
Home> | Handling & Storing | >Chemical Storage | >Yorkshire company fined after worker sustains chemical burns |
Home> | Handling & Storing | >Liquids Handling | >Yorkshire company fined after worker sustains chemical burns |
Yorkshire company fined after worker sustains chemical burns
18 July 2018
A RUBBER inflatable boat manufacturing and repair company has been sentenced after an employee sustained chemical burns while cleaning down a boat using solvents at its factory in Hull.
Hull and Holderness Magistrates’ Court heard how, on 23 March 2016, a worker at Humber Fabrications (Hull) Ltd was tasked with cleaning the deck of a rigid inflatable boat using the solvent dichloromethane. The employee was using a fabric cloth soaked in dichloromethane to wipe and clean the deck of a boat being manufactured. During the work he began to feel light-headed and so took a five minute break. The worker returned to the boat, knelt down inside to carry on cleaning and subsequently collapsed. He was found sometime later by his colleagues lying in a pool of dichloromethane.
The employee was taken by ambulance to Hull Royal Infirmary, where he received treatment for chemical burns to his right underarm and back.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found the company failed to provide suitable control measures for the occasions when employees used dichloromethane to clean the inside of boats. The investigation found there was a failure to provide local exhaust ventilation, suitable respiratory protection or personal protective equipment. In addition, the company had failed to carry out an adequate risk assessment for the use of dichloromethane for cleaning boats and there was also a lack of instruction and training provided to employees for its use.
Humber Fabrications (Hull) Ltd of Wincolmlee, Hull was pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2 (1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and was fined £10,300 with £2,214.10 in costs.
Speaking after the hearing, HSE inspector James Harvey said, “This case reinforces the importance of controlling the risks associated with the use of dichloromethane, which is an incredibly hazardous substance. HSE promotes substituting dichloromethane for less harmful alternative products which do the same job.”
- Consultation on changes to simplify RIDDOR launched
- Engineer jailed for illegal gas work
- Worker injured in fall from garage roof
- Company pleads guilty after fall from height
- Workplace transport inspections begin in manufacturing sector
- SHE Awards announces new date and host
- Employer sentenced after worker struck by excavator
- Online tools to 'reduce burden' on small businesses
- Keep staff safe as temperatures soar, urges TUC
- Job-related stress higher in teachers