
![]() |
Mark Sennett
Managing Editor |
![]() |
Kelly Rose
Editor |
Home> | Plant & Machinery | >Machine Access Control | >Tata Steel fined £1.5m after crush death |
Home> | Plant & Machinery | >Physical Guarding | >Tata Steel fined £1.5m after crush death |
Tata Steel fined £1.5m after crush death
06 August 2025
TATA STEEL has been fined £1.5 million following the death of a contractor at its Port Talbot steelworks plant.

Although power was isolated to part of the system, other sections remained live. As staff worked on the lower level to fix the leak, Justin returned to the floor above and climbed into the conveyor system. His presence triggered sensors that activated a moving beam in a live section, fatally injuring him. He was sadly pronounced dead at the scene.
Tata Steel failed to ensure the conveyor system was properly isolated and guarded. The company did not take sufficient steps to manage the safety of the ongoing work.
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigated Justin’s death and brought a prosecution against Tata for what an inspector described as “basic” health and safety failures.
At the time Tata’s Port Talbot plant was the largest steelworks in the UK. Earlier this month, construction started on Tata’s electric arc furnace (EAF) at the same site.
The HSE investigation into the incident found Tata Steel failed to ensure the work to replace the lift cylinder was done safely. After the job was completed, the company also failed to properly isolate the conveyor system before Justin returned to address the leak.
Tata Steel also failed to ensure the conveyor system was effectively guarded to prevent access to dangerous moving parts of the machinery.
Tata Steel (UK) Ltd, of Grosvenor Place, London, pleaded guilty to breaching Sections 2(1) and 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The company was fined £1.5 million and ordered to pay £26,318.67 in costs at Swansea Crown Court on 31st July 2025.
HSE inspector Gethyn Jones said: “Justin Day’s death could so easily have been prevented. A much-loved family man is not here because of failures in health and safety basics.
“Employers have a responsibility to make sure sufficient procedures are in place to protect workers – both employees and contractors – and that those procedures are understood and followed.
“The dangers of moving machinery are well known. Sufficient risk assessments must be carried out and access to dangerous areas must be properly guarded and controlled.
- Keep workers safe in cold storage
- Care providers fined after employee stabbed
- Workers exposed to harmful chemicals
- Real-time analytics can prevent closures
- Firm fined after death of employee at quarry
- Man spared jail after father fell through roof
- Paper company employee suffers finger amputations
- Employee fatally injured in forklift accident
- Fine after vehicle struck overhead power cable
- HSE publishes work-related fatality figures