The truth about skin in the working environment
29 May 2014
The way in which the skin interacts with our environment is far more complex than many realise. It is all too easy to take action that appears logical, but that can actually increase the risk of damage which may then be irreversible and sufficiently serious to prevent that person from any further employment. Chris Packham offers some advice on how to recognise and control risks surrounding workplace skin exposure.
- Firstly the prevention of damage to health due to skin exposure is complex and often requires specialist knowledge.
- Secondly, it is not easy to demonstrate to an employer whether the organisation is achieving regulatory compliance.
- Thirdly, whilst with physical hazards an accident is sudden and obvious with occupational health the fact that the effect may not be immediately apparent makes it easier for management to ignore or postpone the need for action.
- Fourthly they need to be confident that they have correctly identified the real hazard, particularly where more than one chemical is used during a particular task.
- Different forms of a substance may present different hazards, eg substances may not be hazardous in solid form but may be hazardous when ground into fine powder or dust that can be breathed into the lungs.
- Nanoparticles (ie particles less than 100 nanometers) may be more toxic than larger particles of the same chemical substance.
- Impurities in a substance can make it more hazardous, eg crystalline silica is often present in minerals which would otherwise present little or no hazard.
- Some substances have a fibrous form which may present a potentially serious risk to health if the fibres are of a certain size or shape.
- Some substances have a known health effect but the mechanism causing it is unknown, eg certain dusts of textile raw materials cause byssinosis.
- Exposure to two or more substances at the same time or one after the other may have an added or synergistic effect.
- Epidemiological or other data, eg reports of illness due to new and emerging agents, indicate that a biological agent that does not already appear in The Approved List of biological agents could nevertheless cause a hazard to health.
- One-off, emergency situations arising out of the work activity, such as a dangerous chemical reaction or fire, could foreseeably produce a substance hazardous to health.
- ‘Wet work’ is one of the most frequently and consistently reported causes of irritant occupational contact dermatitis. ‘Wet work’ is the term used to describe tasks involving prolonged or frequent contact with water, particularly in combination with soaps and detergents.