
![]() |
Mark Sennett
Managing Editor |
![]() |
Kelly Rose
Editor |
ARTICLE
EEF warns against increasing burden of European legislation
23 January 2013
The manufacturers organisation, the EEF is urging the UK government to redouble efforts to build an alliance with other EU member states to reduce the burden of health & safety legislation and remove unnecessary bureaucracy.
The manufacturers organisation, the EEF is urging the UK government to redouble efforts to build an alliance with other EU member states to reduce the burden of health & safety legislation and remove unnecessary bureaucracy.
The call comes following the EEF's annual health & safety survey which is said to show companies' concern at proposals for more legislation. In contrast, the EEF says the survey revealed a strong appetite for case study guidance as the best means of improving control of key risks.
Commenting, EEF head of health & safety, Steve Pointer, said: “The legislative framework in the UK is mature and there is little belief amongst those managing health & safety that further legislation would raise standards. However, whilst there is pressure in the UK to reduce legislation and remove unnecessary bureaucracy, the European Commission is moving in the opposite direction, continuing to propose new legal requirements.
Two pieces of proposed EU legislation which are due to be extended were looked at. Firstly three quarters of companies disagreed with European Commission proposals to require that stress and work pressure be considered as part of risk assessments for back pain and other musculoskeletal disorders.
Secondly, the finding for proposals to change legislation on Ionising Radiations was particularly striking. Of the quarter of businesses that worked with ionising radiations, 95% believed that the current law is appropriate and should be neither tightened nor relaxed. EEF believes both of these findings suggest a strong endorsement of the current legislation as fit for purpose.
www.eef.org.uk
The call comes following the EEF's annual health & safety survey which is said to show companies' concern at proposals for more legislation. In contrast, the EEF says the survey revealed a strong appetite for case study guidance as the best means of improving control of key risks.
Commenting, EEF head of health & safety, Steve Pointer, said: “The legislative framework in the UK is mature and there is little belief amongst those managing health & safety that further legislation would raise standards. However, whilst there is pressure in the UK to reduce legislation and remove unnecessary bureaucracy, the European Commission is moving in the opposite direction, continuing to propose new legal requirements.
Two pieces of proposed EU legislation which are due to be extended were looked at. Firstly three quarters of companies disagreed with European Commission proposals to require that stress and work pressure be considered as part of risk assessments for back pain and other musculoskeletal disorders.
Secondly, the finding for proposals to change legislation on Ionising Radiations was particularly striking. Of the quarter of businesses that worked with ionising radiations, 95% believed that the current law is appropriate and should be neither tightened nor relaxed. EEF believes both of these findings suggest a strong endorsement of the current legislation as fit for purpose.
www.eef.org.uk
MORE FROM THIS COMPANY
- Safety first when working at heights
- Construction firm and director fined for safety breaches
- Fine after worker crushed by plasterboard
- Demolition firm in the dock after worker falls from height
- Tackle workplace mental health risks, urges alliance
- Firefighter breaks both legs in training
- Building contractor sentenced over unsafe work practice
- Fine after worker severed finger
- Report highlights Scottish workplace health crisis
- Cases of work-related stress at an 18-year high
RELATED ARTICLES
- No related articles listed
OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS SECTION