
![]() |
Mark Sennett
Managing Editor |
![]() |
Kelly Rose
Editor |
Home> | Premises | >Fire Safety | >More funds needed to remove unsafe cladding |
More funds needed to remove unsafe cladding
26 November 2020
THE BRITISH Safety Council supports the call by the House of Commons Housing Committee that the Government must protect leaseholders from having to pay towards removing flammable cladding from their homes.
The Housing Committee said it was alarmed that a £1.6 billion Government fund set up after the Grenfell fire was inadequate to cover the cost of repairs needed.
Mike Robinson, the British Safety Council’s chief executive, commented, “The Government must provide sufficient protection against leaseholders paying the bill for the removal of unsafe cladding from tower blocks. Making sure those buildings are safe – and that people feel safer in them – should be the Government’s responsibility at no cost to leaseholders.
The Government has failed to deliver its pledge, made after the Grenfell tragedy, to provide safe alternatives to dangerous cladding on all buildings in England taller than 18 metres by June this year. According to the Government’s own figures, only a third (155 out of 455) of high-rise buildings with similar cladding to Grenfell had this replaced by September 2020.
It has now been over three years since Grenfell, in which 72 people lost their lives, and action to deliver this commitment should be accelerated.”
- Health and Safety Scotland 2018
- Ex-director charged for exporting banned waste
- New guidance on mental health at work
- British Safety Council supports ‘Battery Breakdown’ campaign
- Driving for work is campaign's theme
- Roofing company fined after worker falls
- Garage sentenced after mechanic's life-changing fall injuries
- Proposals to slash legal costs in personal injury claims welcomed
- Two companies fined after worker injured
- Hotelier jailed for fire safety breaches