
![]() |
Mark Sennett
Managing Editor |
![]() |
Kelly Rose
Editor |
Home> | Slips, Trips & Falls | >Fall Prevention | >Fines after catalogue of safety breaches |
Home> | Slips, Trips & Falls | >Fall Protection | >Fines after catalogue of safety breaches |
Home> | Premises | >Security | >Fines after catalogue of safety breaches |
Fines after catalogue of safety breaches
26 April 2021
THE CLIENTS and principal contractor of a construction project have been sentenced following numerous serious health and safety failings.
There were also reports that bricks had fallen from the scaffold, and the building’s gable end wall apex section had at one point collapsed onto the neighbouring property. Despite HSE serving a number of enforcement notices and notification of contravention letters, serious breaches of health and safety law continued and there was a failure to comply with the enforcement notices.
An investigation by HSE found the project’s joint clients, Richard Balls and London and Essex Property Partnership Ltd had failed to make suitable arrangements to manage the project. They did not ensure the principal contractor complied with his duties under the Construction Design and Management Regulations, and in Richard Ball’s case, did not comply with one HSE improvement notice issued to improve health and safety standards on the site. The project’s principal contractor, Ludovic Calo, failed to plan, manage, and monitor effectively to ensure the construction work was carried out safely, failed to ensure work at height was properly planned and carried out safely, failed to take suitable measures to prevent the fall of materials from the scaffold and did not comply with two HSE-issued improvement notices served to improve health and safety standards on the site.
Ludovic Calo of Kitchener Road, Walthamstow was found guilty of breaching Regulation 13(1) of The Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015; Sections 4(1) and 10(1) of The Work at Height Regulations 2005; and two charges under Section 21 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. He received a 29 week suspended custodial sentence, 3 months electronic curfew 9pm-6am and ordered to pay costs of £5,000.
Richard Balls, of Henham, Bishops Stortford was found guilty of breaching Sections 4(1) and 4(3) of The Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015, and Section 21 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. He received a 29 week suspended custodial sentence, 3 months electronic curfew 9pm-6am and ordered to pay costs of £5,000.
London & Essex Property Partnership Ltd of Scratton Road, Stanford Le Hope were found guilty of breaching Sections 4(3) and 4(6)(b) of The Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015. The company was fined £20,000 and ordered to pay costs of £5,000.
Speaking after the hearing, HSE inspector Glyn Davies said, “Property developers and construction firms should be aware that HSE will not hesitate to prosecute those who fall below the required standards, especially where advice and enforcement fails to improve their management of health and safety.
“Commercial clients and principal contractors have significant and wide-ranging duties to comply with construction health and safety law, and it is not acceptable to cut costs and maximise profit at the expense of putting people at risk.”
- Explosion injured employee and endangered homeowners
- Fine after wasp nest removal results in fall
- Disabled teachers need more support
- Winners announced for the Safety & Health Excellence Awards
- Behaviour impacts road safety, report shows
- Resmar keeps HSM staff safe this Christmas
- Research paints gloomy picture of UK workplace
- Glass company fined £80k after worker's fall
- Most common workplace injuries revealed
- Fire and Security Matters Awards 2022 finalists revealed