
![]() |
Mark Sennett
Managing Editor |
![]() |
Kelly Rose
Editor |
Home> | Industry Update | >Company News | >Two companies fined after worker struck by scaffolding |
Two companies fined after worker struck by scaffolding
28 June 2017
Two South West based companies have been fined after a 44-year old woman was struck by scaffolding.
Weymouth Magistrates’ Court heard how employees of Carter Training were using a mobile crane on the building project in Queen Mothers Square, Poundbury, Dorchester when the attachment holding 500 scaffolding fittings weighing 2kg each was turned on its side emptying all contents onto workers and the concrete flooring 10.5 metres below.
The worker suffered two fractures to her left shoulder blade, a fracture to her left collar bone, a cut to the back of her head and bruising.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found the stillage attachment used on the crane was not suitable for lifting heavy and large amounts of scaffolding. Lifting the scaffolding directly above a number of contractors working below also put them at risk of harm.
It was also found that principal contractor Zero C Holdings failed to carry out an audit of all lifting plans and as a result failed to manage the risks associated with this lifting activity. Zero C Holdings did not have clear lines of communication between the lifting company Carter Training and contractors working on the site below.
Zero C Holdings has pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 13 (1) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 and has been fined £145,000 and ordered to pay costs of £3500.
Carter Training (services) has pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 8 (1) Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998, and has been fined £18,000 and ordered to pay costs of £3500.
Speaking after the hearing HSE inspector Nicole Buchanan said: “The worker is very lucky that her injuries were not life threatening. Both Zero C Holdings and Carter Training put a number of workers at risk of harm when they failed to plan or identify the risks of heavy lifting.
“This case highlights the need for duty holders to properly plan all lifting operations before work is carried out to manage the risk of injury to workers. Lifting directly above workers is inherently unsafe and should be avoided wherever possible”
- Estate agents fined after member of the public fell down a well
- Firm sentenced after worker dies after inhaling paint stripper
- Construction firms invited to mock trial
- Manufacturer fined after worker suffered cement burns on first day of work
- Council and contractors fined after man dies and another seriously injured in roadworks
- Man sentenced after death of retired farmer
- Worker seriously injured in silo incident
- Company prosecuted after workers were severely burned
- HSE statement: Alton Towers owners’ plead guilty to safety failings
- Global energy firm fined £1.4m after worker killed in refinery fire