|Home>||Plant & Machinery||>General Plant & Machinery||>Fine after apprentice injured on bending machine|
Fine after apprentice injured on bending machine
24 January 2019
AN ENGINEERING company has been fined after an apprentice suffered serious hand injuries when he was drawn into machinery.
Cannock Magistrates’ Court heard how, on 3 March 2018, the 19-year-old apprentice was forming a piece of sheet metal into a radius using a three-roll bending machine. He was wearing gloves when his hand was drawn in by the in-running nip between two steel rollers. As a result, the apprentice had two fingers severed and also suffered crush injuries to his right hand.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that a safe system of work, adequate training and effective supervision were lacking. The use of gloves increased the likelihood of being drawn in to the dangerous parts of the machine.
Air Management & Design Ltd of Spencroft Road, Newcastle under Lyme, Staffordshire pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health & Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The company was fined £12,000 and ordered to pay costs of £1,301.20.
HSE inspector Wendy Campbell said after the hearing, “A young man’s life has been changed because his employer failed to ensure adequate training in and supervision of a safe system of work for the use of a powered three roll bending machine.
“This is a reminder to all companies to check that fully fingered gloves are not worn, and safe systems of work are in place and being followed for operation of dangerous machinery such as three-roll bending machines.”
- Research reveals shocking seat belt statistics
- Older generation more anxious about returning to work
- Managers failing to encourage green behaviour
- Yoghurt manufacturer's £600k fine
- Double prosecution for inadequate asbestos removal
- SHE Awards announces new date and host
- Survey reveals workers' safety concerns
- HSM and BSIF Guide nominated for top industry awards
- Government to modernise product safety laws
- “Swift response” needed to protect ‘gig’ workers